Calderbank offers, also known as "without prejudice save as to costs" offers, are a form of settlement offer that can be made in the context of litigation or potential litigation in Australia. They are named after the 1975 case of Calderbank v Calderbank, where the court upheld the validity of a settlement offer made "without prejudice save as to costs" that had been rejected by the other party.
Calderbank offers are often made as a last attempt to settle a dispute before proceeding to trial. They can be a useful tool for parties seeking to avoid the risks and costs associated with litigation. In this Business Kitz article, we will explore the essential elements of a Calderbank offer, their advantages and disadvantages, and how they can be used effectively.
To be effective, a Calderbank offer must meet several essential elements. These include:
The term "without prejudice" means that the offer is made on a confidential basis and cannot be used as evidence in court if the offer is rejected. However, if the offer is accepted and the case settles, the offer can be referred to in court when deciding who should pay the costs of the case.
A Calderbank offer must be a genuine attempt to settle the dispute. The offer should be reasonable, taking into account the strengths and weaknesses of the case, the costs of litigation, and the likely outcome of the trial. If the offer is seen as a tactical move or an attempt to gain an advantage in the case, it may not be effective.
The terms of the offer must be clear and unambiguous, so that there is no confusion about what is being offered. The offer should specify the amount of money being offered, the scope of any other relief being sought, and the timeframe for accepting the offer.
Calderbank offers have several advantages and disadvantages that should be considered before making an offer.
In conclusion, Calderbank offers can be a useful tool for parties seeking to settle a dispute before proceeding to trial. However, to be effective, the offer must meet certain essential elements, including being made "without prejudice save as to costs," a genuine attempt to settle the dispute, and clear and unambiguous terms. While Calderbank offers have advantages such as reduced costs, certainty, and control over the dispute resolution process, they also have potential disadvantages, including loss of confidentiality, risk of cost penalties, and the risk of setting a precedent.
If you have any questions regarding the legalities surrounding Calderbank offers, please do not hesitate to contact our sister company, Legal Kitz. The Legal Kitz team are happy to assist you. Alternatively you can request to book a free 30-minute consultation with their experienced and highly qualified team via our website now. Additionally, you can also check out the Business Kitz subscription service today to access our full range of legal, commercial and employment documents to begin your business with a solid foundation that ensures compliance.